Encash earned leaves calculation

Standard IAS 19 Employee Benefits prescribes rules for recognition and presentation of various types of benefits that employers provide to their employees. Have you ever read about employee benefits that the best employer in the world—Google provides to its employees? Just to name a few of them besides great salaries: Free haircuts, gourmet food, high-tech cleansing toilets, on-site medical care, travel insurance, fun stuff around the office, paid maternity leave….

But now, look at it as a CFO. No problem to account for the benefits such as salaries or free haircuts. But what about that death benefit?

The issue here is that the benefit is not paid while the employee is in service… only after it. And Google really does not know when the employees die and thus the liability becomes payable.

Calculation of Encashment of Leave Formula | Galaxy World

It tells us how to account for various kinds of employee benefits and how to present them in the financial statements. The main objective of IAS 19 is to prescribe the accounting and disclosure for employee benefits.

IAS 19 requires and entity to recognize:. Short-term employee benefits include all the following items if payable within 12 months after the end of the reporting period:. The entity shall recognize short-term employee benefits as an expense to profit or loss unless another IFRS requires or permits the inclusion of the benefits in the cost of an asset. Expected cost of short-term paid absences shall be recognized when the employees render service that increases their entitlement to future paid absences in the case of accumulating paid absences ; or when the absences occur in the case of non-accumulating paid absences.

Profit sharing and bonuses: An entity shall recognize the expected cost of profit-sharing and bonus payments when the entity has a present legal or constructive obligation to make such payments as a result of past events; and a reliable estimate of the obligation can be made.

A present obligation exists when, and only when, the entity has no realistic alternative but to make the payments. Post-employment benefits include items such as various pensions, retirement benefits, post-employment life insurance and post-employment medical care. It is absolutely crucial to know the difference between the two and to classify your post-employment benefit correctly, as the accounting treatment is totally different for each of them.

Defined contribution plans are post-employment benefit plans under which an entity pays fixed contributions into a separate entity a fund and will have no legal or constructive obligation to pay further contributions if the fund does not hold sufficient assets to pay all employee benefits relating to employee service in the current and prior periods. The employer shall recognize contributions payable to a defined contribution plan as an expense to profit or loss unless another IFRS requires or permits the inclusion of the benefits in the cost of an asset.

When the contributions are not expected to be settled wholly before twelve months after the end of the reporting period, they shall be discounted. Defined benefit plans are post-employment benefit plans other than defined contribution plans. Under defined benefit plan, the employer has the obligation to pay specified amount of benefits according to the plan to the employee and all investment and actuarial risk thus fall on the entity.

And here we come to an answer to the Google question: Accounting for defined benefit plans is probably one of the most complex issues in IFRS because it involves incorporating actuarial assumptions into measurement of the obligation and the expenses. Therefore, actuarial gain and losses arise. Also, obligations are measured on a discounted basisbecause they might be settled many years after the employees render the related services.

The employers shall perform the following steps in order to account for the defined benefit plan:. Deficit or surplus is a difference between the present value of defined benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets as at the end of the reporting period. In order to determine it, the entity must:. Although there is quite enough numbers involved in accounting for defined benefit plan, IAS 19 requires to present them as 1 single amount in the statement of financial position — the net defined benefit liability assetwhich is basically deficit or surplus calculated in the step 1, but adjusted for the effect of asset ceiling.

Asset ceiling is the present value of any economic benefits available in the form of refunds from the plan or reductions in the future contributions to the plan. Other long-term benefits include the following items if not expected to be settled within 12 months after the end of the period in which the employee renders the related service:.

As other long-term benefits are not subject to so much uncertainty as defined benefit plans, the accounting treatment is a bit easier. However, the entity should perform the same steps as I have described at defined benefit plans. The only difference is that all items such as service cost, net interest on the net defined benefit liability asset and remeasurements of the net defined benefit liability asset are presented in the profit or loss — so nothing goes to other comprehensive income.

Termination benefits represent quite a different cup of tea than the previous 3 categories. Because they are not provided in exchange for the service of the employee; instead, they are provided in exchange for the termination of employment. However, be careful here, because the termination benefit sometimes includes the benefit for BOTH the termination of employment AND the service of employee at the same time. For example, a company closes one of its production plants and offers the bonus of 1 USD to all employees who will be laid off.

But because this company needs qualified people to perform the closure, it offers the bonus of 3 USD to each employee who stays with the company until the closure is completed. The primary question here is WHEN to recognize the liability and expense for termination benefits. It is at the earlier of:. The next question is HOW to recognize termination benefits. This depends on the specific terms of the benefits:. Learn top 7 IFRS mistakes that companies make in their reporting and how to avoid them easily!

This is really helpful and you have made things so simple, reading feels like story and connects us with the concept very intuitively. You are doing a great job and we all are really grateful to you…. Hello, thank you very much — I am happy to help S. Thanks for your brilliant videos, they helped me immensely, please do a video on the re-measurements, with the concept of asset ceiling explained in the question!! Slivia you lectures are very helpful. Thanks for sharing such usefull ,easy stuff……….

Hi Naseem, measurement of retirement benefit obligations remains under IAS 19 even after merger. So you simply account for it under IAS 19 as before. Hi Silvia, Let me explain. In fact, I am actually performing the audit of a merged government entity. I want to reassure myself about the accounting treatment in line with IAS 19 as the accounts did not properly reflect the required treatment as per IAS However, at time of take over the the pension obligation was valued using the previous method of IAS 19 with the corridor approach.

In fact I am performing the audit of the first year accounts of a merged government entity. All the assets and liabilities were taken over including the retained earnings of the different merged entities by the Newly formed entity. Naseem, there are 2 things to differentiate: Due to what reasons? Hope it helps S. Your articles are really awesome. I love it but unfortunately I am unable to watch your videos as youtube is banned in Pakistan.

Kindly upload your videos on other sites as well.

Waiting for your positive reply. Dear Salman, thanks a lot for your feedback and advice. Yes, I know about this problem in Pakistan. I promise to do something about it in the future. It is really great there is a place in internet where someone may ask questions concerning IAS And I have several of them.

How should a reconciliation from the opening balance to the closing balance look like in case of existing benefit plan when an entity decides to start reflecting liabilites for the first time? Should whole reserve amount at the end of accounting period be shown as a past service cost or some kind of restatement for the beginnig of period should be calculated with the same actuarial assumptions? It happens the entity changes the actuary.

Each actuary uses his own model and results differ a bit. The best way to recognize the discrepancy arising out of models is to recalculate the opening balance once again in the new one. IAS 19 does not mention about such cases and majority of actuaries put the difference into actuarial gains and losses well, sometimes the data base as at the beginning of period is not available.

How should this difference be reflected in books and shown in the reconciliantion? And similar question concerns amendments of errors in data base between OB and CB or mistakes in reflecting conditions of benefit program in actuarial model. According to our domestic standard the reconciliation from the opening balance to the closing balance focuses only on future liabilites explanation in the financial statements and then the benefits due within the accounting period are shown as the position described in par.

Current liabilities benefits due but not paid before closing date are treated separately because of their different nature. It seems, in a case of IAS 19, the opening and close balances include both future and current liabilites in the reconciliation. Hi Iwona, OK, you raised lots of questions, but let me try to reply them shortly: When there were some mistakes, then you maybe need to assess whether the mistakes were material and if yes, then apply IAS 8 and correct accounting errors retrospectively.

I am very glad that thanks to you we have an opportunity to exchange opinions and ask questions regarding IAS I also thank you very much for your response and your explanations to my questions and doubts.

But it is still not fully clear for me I am sorry, I am an actuary and not an expert in accounting, in addition I am not very familiar with accounting language, particularly English. With respect to point 1: You used the plural: Regarding point 2 I would like to reassure myself: I will revert to the problem of changing actuarial model later on as it needs some more explanation.

Hi Iwona, 1 past service cost: It simply shows the numbers as you would have always applied the new accounting policies. Thank you for your answer once again. Yes, in general the definition of PSC is given by art. However, in my opinion, the past service cost is not limited only to changes of benefit plan or curtailment. If it was so then art. It seems any change of reserves that does not violate art. Changes binary options vs futures reserves caused by cases mentioned in art.

And because they ARE changes of service cost the past service cost seems to be a good solution for their presentation as it charges current year but clearly points that concerns german ifo business climate belajar forex periods periods before change.

Well, it is my understanding of IAS 19 but I am not an expert and then I appreciate very much a possibility to exchange opinions. After receiving your reply I familiarized myself a bit with IAS 8 and I refer back to point 1. In reality it is not changing of accounting policy then but just a voice of reason as cost of actuarial calculation can be sometimes comparable to level of reserves. Do not you think that in such cases the past service cost could be better approach I assume the past service cost charges current year as is more simple?

The mature company is another case and you are right, the whole reserve cannot create the cost of current year. But still I cannot imagine restatement of several dozen years retrospectively. There were other people employed in the past, a lot of benefits already paid according to previous accounting policy etc.

Then I would apply par. The approach can be also applied to young companies is universal but the solution involving past service costs raghee horner forex trading for maximum profit pdf such cases does not violate rules of IAS 8, I think.

Forexoma bollinger bands 8 also states in para 24 and 25 some exceptions — so please refer to there. If you agree not to apply it retrospectively so how to present it then if not as PSC? After all it IS service cost and concerns past period longer than one year. Treating the small reserves calculated for the first time as PSC causes only that they charge current year which seems to be proper in case we do not want to apply retrospective treatment because of they not material amount.

Iwona, I would rather present it as effect of change in accounting policy in line with IAS 8 rather than past service cost, because it is simply NOT past service cost. In understand your thoughts, but believe me, I have gone through many financial statements where the change in accounting policy is simply NOT the same as past service cost or any other item. Thank you very much for your response and your explanation.

OK I accept, the first calculation resulting in not material amount of reserve cannot be treated as the PSC. If the reserve first calculation is material and we restate opening balances how should I show it in my actuarial report?

Should the opening balance in reconciliation be 0 plus the item: Or is it indifferent and both ways are proper? If the reserve is not material and we agreed not to treat it retrospectively how to show it in reconciliation then? As a current service cost because not the past service cost as you have said?

Or just to select the part concerning the past periods and show it as the additional item separate from current service cost and interest but charging the current year as being not material? From my side the most convenient approach would be to show the opening balance as 0 in any case no matter if the first reserve is material or not and present the part concerning the past periods as separate item leaving the decision about treatment retrospectively or not to the entity livestock market ontario report ordered calculations.

But I am not sure if I may do something like that. And by the way, I assume all the time the past service cost charges current period. But I would like to be sure of that. Could you please confirm it? I have already asked about it. Thanks for this article. I have one doubt. Should we include Car running costs in Employee benefits? Vehcile related expenses Fuel, RepairingDepreciationInsurance ,etc. Dear chacko, in my opinion, it depends on the actual usage of andrea carosi forex cars.

You should really set these guidelines in some internal regulation. Thank you very much for your straight answer.

Depreciation amount for personal use will go to employee benefits in statements. In this case can we say we prepare our financial statement according to IFRS and then if we disclose this non compliance in our financial statement is it ok. Hi nayana, No, you CANNOT mark your financial statements as compliant with IFRS unless you comply with ALL the requirements see IAS 1, paragraph Even if you disclose the non-compliance, this is not a remedy to the situation.

It is the requirement of IAS 1, paragraph 18, to be more precise. Dear Nayana, all comments must be approved by me before posted and I do it once per days, so you need forex factory renko charts patient.

First off, thank you for summarizing this IAS. It definitely helps in trying to understand the concepts. Second, for the defined benefit plan, what kind of journal entries would you record if an employee retires and gets post-employment benefits for both sides for a defined benefit liability and defined benefit asset.

Dear Trini, it would be the same entry. You need to realize that the net defined benefit cash and stock traders noosa opening hours or liability consists of defined benefit liability, and plan assets, and usually, in the accounting records, this is monitored separately.

Just in the presentation, you net it off. Could you please tell me whether we have to show the following expenses under employee costs as per IFRS. Hi Sumitha, employee costs are in fact employee benefits in return for their stock jobbers and stock brokers. So what I suggest: It depends on what is more relevant and reliable.

Dear Silvia, I have some doubts regarding presentation of the change in reserves employee benefits caused by a one-time, extremely trading places the practice and politics of adoption summary and unpredictable materialization of actuarial assumptions.

For example theoreticalthe explosion has occurred in the company and it has resulted in a certain percentage of deaths and disabilities among employees. If the company is not involved in a type of activity burdened with such risk eg. It seems that in the described case the injured workers will generate high positive past service costs relating to death benefits and disability benefits and negative PSC regarding other benefits. But it does not clear result from IAS Maybe the ways of presentation of such unusual phenomena are mentioned in some other IASes.

I would appreciate very much your opinion in the above matter. Thank you and best regards Iwona. Hi Iwona, I get your point, however, in my opinion, this issue does not relate to past service 247 binary options in forex trading systems — PSC are in question only when you introduce new plan, or benefits, amend new plan etc.

Yes, I understand, that this one-off event would totally mess up with your obligation and in my opinion, this could result in actuarial losses. Thank you very much for your response which as usual was very helpful. I have written to you as I try to find some general definition of PSC and AGL for better understanding.

And everything off, unpredictable and therefore impossible and even forbidden to reflect in actuarial assumptions results in PSC it was not fully consistent with the definition of PSC but it seemed logical. But now, after your answer, there is a quite how to make 100 million mesos in maplestory picture.

There were also other reasons of my doubts: That is true the reduction caused by the described explosion is something different and gives totally different result than restructuring but the latter refers to the rate of employee rotation in the same way as the first to mortality and disability as restructuring is non-standard, unpredictable materialization of rotation rate which is one of the actuarial assumptions.

It would be very helpful to know an intention of IAS 19 as to recognizing PSC in profit and loss account and AGL in other comprehensive income in case of post-employment benefits. One of the reasons is significant postponing the benefits in time because such approach does not concern other long-term benefits. First of all, AGL ex post reflects materialization of the actuarial assumptions in the current period and then recognition of this item in the income statement would be fully justified it is not postponed in time at all.

Secondly, AGL ex post very often includes changes in reserves which have nothing to do with actuarial assumptions change of an actuary or improvements of an actuarial model, corrections of small errors in a data base etc. Maybe changes of IAS 19 will go in this direction in the future.

Thank you immensely for a lovely summary of IAS19I have always previously tried running away from it but I know am confident about IAS I have on question that is bothering me, we have an entity that has a post retirement plan for 5 of its directors.

That they will after retirement until death provide for medical benefits for them. What I want buying stocks on margin wiki know is each director has a different life span so we can get an actuary to do a caluclation based on the life 1-3-2 option strategy of the directors and calculate the obligation.

Surely we dont provide for all our future expenses 20maybe 30 years later. So I would like to know what portion must we recognise now, what does IAS19 say? Hi Firdaus, your actuary should estimate the present value of medical benefits at the time of their retirement e. I know — lots of estimates and judgements. I solve similar example in the IFRS Kit in encash earned leaves calculation detail. Have a nice day! Thanks for the wonderful articles in your website, I could not find the answer for the below question in your articles related to employee benefit.

Thank you so much for giving us such a resourceful knowledge on IFRS. However, our auditors have been insisting on the segregation requirement as per IAS 1. Is it really necessary for the segregation in this particular case? Remaining unavailed leaves can be accrued and cash equivalent to number of accrued leave at the time of retirement is paid to the employee. Under which class of employee benefit will this benefit fall? Will the liability required to be valued actuarially?

Hi, 1 Yes, your auditors are right. It should not be a problem to estimate how much you are going to pay within the next 12 months after the end of the reporting period — this amount should be undiscounted and included in total liability.

The reason is that the benefit has already been earned in the particular year. May I ask if the company does not accrue for the retirement benefit obligation, then, suddenly an employee retires for the year. Come next year, the company opt to accrue for the RBO, will the company restate its prior year financial statements to make it comparative and to recognize the past service cost?

Leave Encashment: Calculation & Taxation

Dear Silvia, Thank you for your great job! Your summaries are really the easiest Briefing of IFRSs I ever seen.

I will recommend to my colleagues! Silvia I love you.!! You really make it simple to grab the concept… Thanks! Silvia you did an excellent job for us thanks alot for this.

Salam silvie, Sadly I came to know about your videos very late but still they are very helpful. I just wanted to know that are you a social worker? If not then how come some one provide everyone with that much load of material and very well explained videos of standards in free.

That surely would have taken so much hard work to do all the stuff and that in free. I really appreciate you from the bottom of my heart. You are an angel. Plus, I love teaching others!

Thank you for the comment! Hi…I am going to sit for p7 acca advanced audit in june. Hi Silvia, Thanks for a really thorough and practical guide to IAS As much as I like to refer to the actual text, sometimes the lack of concrete examples just does not help. I have seen a company start accruing the cost two years before as the rational is that people will stay another two years to get the bonus.

It seems reasonable to me that the accrual starts in Year 5, as IAS19 mentions that short term bonus is one that will be claimed within 12 months after Year-5 i.

Dear Flick, for me, this bonus appears as defined benefit plan. Of course, this involves discounting and other actuarial stuff, too — you do not simply book the accrual as you described above. As this benefit is dependent upon the completion of 6 years and will not be paid if an employee leaves earlier, you should take the probability of staying in employment for 6 years into account when estimating the obligation.

To sum up — there are actuarial calculations involved and yes, you need to follow defined benefit plan accounting under IAS 19 rather than the approach you described in your question. Thanks for the summary I do not know i talking nonsense. Hi Albi, normally, this is an expense incurred by the company.

If you have signed certain personal responsibility or liability with your employees, then you can claim this amount from him — but you should not account for a compensation unless it is certain e. It is normal practice for entities to engage an actuary to perform the actuarial valuation needed to calculate its defined benefit obligation. However, the IFRS for SMEs does not require an actuary to be engaged. The defined benefit obligation is recorded at present values, taking into account future salary increases and using a discount rate derived from the yield on high-quality corporate bonds with a maturity consistent with the expected maturity of the obligations.

In countries where no deep market in high-quality corporate bonds exists, the yield on government bonds is used. Thank you for the illustration, which is easy to understand. I would also like to know about how to account for the conversion between the DBP and DCP. Hi Siliva, thanks very much for your support I have a question; how do you treat this according to IAS19, On 1st JuneMango Ltd revised the terms of the scheme and this revision resulted in an additional obligation of CUDear Edmand, is this some homework question?

It looks like You know you should do your homework yourself To give you a hint — these are the typical past service costs S. Dear Siliva, Could you please explain on my confusion about the defined benefit plan? The sum is mentioned below. On 31 August the director decided to close a business segment which did not fit into future strategy. The closure commenve on 5 Oct and was due to be completed on 31 Dec Entity will pay this amont into the plan on 31 Jan Kindly explain me what i concept is right or wrong.

Usually every year on 30 of April my company pays bonuses to managers and sales management on the basis of sales and profit for the previous year. These are typical short-term benefits, that were earned in previous year and must be paid in next year. But the calculation of benefit precise sum we perform on 1 of April depends on fact of cash received from buyers incl.

Can we recognize provision at the year-end date? What the difference between provisions under IAS 37 and liability recognized according to Profit-sharing and bonus plans IAS 19 art.

My auditor says that this is not a provision. I must not recognize any provision or liability at the year end, only after calculation and approval of bonuses on 1 of April.

It will be expenses of the next, not previous year. Yes, I agree, this is not provision, but I think that this is expenses of previous year and therefore at the year- end I should present liability IAS 19 at the balance sheet. Please, give your professional advice. Just responded below your newer question. Basically, I agree with your auditor. Difference between bonuses and profit sharing is that bonuses are stated in the contract as a part of remuneration and as such they do not need to be approved by shareholders on the general assembly after the year-end.

But I dont understand your point about each employee account. Is this accruals attributes to each employee with related taxes recognized or in total sum like provisions. What the difference between provisions under IAS 37 and liability recognized according to Profit-sharing and bonus plans IAS 19?

Hi Olena, in practice yes, you should calculate the exact amount of bonus accrual to each employee. Profit sharing — here, the problem is that the profit distribution can be attributed only to shareholders, not employees.

And, you should recognize that expense in the period when: Home Articles About IFRS IFRS videos Financial Statements Consolidation and Groups Revenue recognition Financial Instruments Income Tax Foreign currency Leases PPE IAS 16 and related Impairment of assets Intangible assets Inventories Provisions and Contingencies Accounting estimates IAS 8 Employees US GAAP Not just IFRS IFRS Courses IFRS Kit FAQ Contact About Us FREE UPDATES My Account.

IAS 19 Employee Benefits. EmployeesIFRS SummariesIFRS videos. Have you already checked out the IFRS Kit? Click here to check it out! You will also receive a valuable IFRS mini-course. Fill out the form below to get your Free Report: This course is really helping me. Thanks for your lessons and i was share this articles with my friends. I have never seen IAS19 in such simple and understandable form.

If yes, how do we account for the changes in the restated figures. Hi Silvia, In fact I am performing the audit of the first year accounts of a merged government entity. I think it should be applied retrospectively in line with IAS 8. Hi Silvia Your articles are really awesome. Waiting for your positive reply Thanks and Regards Salman Sohail. Hi Silvia, It is really great there is a place in internet where someone may ask questions concerning IAS Thanks and regards Iwona.

Hi Silvia, I am very glad that thanks to you we have an opportunity to exchange opinions and ask questions regarding IAS And thank you for your confirmation as to point 3.

Hi Silvia, Thank you for your answer once again. Dear Silvia, After receiving your reply I familiarized myself a bit with IAS 8 and I refer back to point 1. I would appreciate your confirmation of above or your point of view. Thank you very much for your help, best regards Iwona. Hi Silvia, If you agree not to apply it retrospectively so how to present it then if not as PSC?

Thank you very much for explanation of retrospective application. It has been very helpful. Hi Silvia, Thank you very much for your response and your explanation.

Thank you very much, best regards Iwona. Hi Silvia, Thanks for this article. Vehcile related expenses Fuel, RepairingDepreciationInsurance ,etc please advise.

Hi, Thank you very much for your straight answer. Thank you very much for your clear answer it is very valuable. Hello, First off, thank you for summarizing this IAS. Dear Silivia, Could you please tell me whether we have to show the following expenses under employee costs as per IFRS 1 Training costs 2 Recruitment costs 3 Overtime 4 Overtime premium 5 Commission to Sales executives for Selling goods 6 Commission to employees for Collecting payments from customers 7 Special bonus paid to direct employees for completing a Job means completing the job taking less hours than Standard number of hours allotted.

Thanks for your kind consideration. I am stuck here.: Dear Silvia, Thank you very much for your response which as usual was very helpful. Once again thank you for the clarification and the opportunity to exchange thoughts.

Earned Leave Encashment Calculation [Thread ] - CiteHR

Hi Sylvia Thank you immensely for a lovely summary of IAS19I have always previously tried running away from it but I know am confident about IAS Hi Silvia, Thank you so much for giving us such a resourceful knowledge on IFRS.

Silvia, Thank you for this. If yes, how will the company computes for the past service cost? Wondered what your thoughts are about treatment of a bonus? This is an incentive for employees to stay in a job. So it would be great to know your thoughts in how it should be treated in the accounts. Would the Year 4 value be a normal accrual: Dr Expense Cr Accrual? Or should the accrual only really start in Year 5? Dear Silvia, Thanks for the summary I do not know i talking nonsense.

Hi Silvia, Thank you for the illustration, which is easy to understand. Post a Reply Name: How to Account for Debt Factoring or Selling of Receivables When I was auditing the financial statements of How to Make Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows with Foreign Currencies Did you know that many groups prepare their cons How to Make Hedging Documentation If your company enters into some derivatives or Troubles with IFRS 16 Leases The new lease standard IFRS 16 can initially cau This website uses cookies to improve your experience.

By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Please enter your e-mail address. You will receive a new password via e-mail. Please check your inbox to confirm your subscription.